I decided to wait until the year drew to a close before running the best of 2019 poll. And after scanning through all the papers all I can say is–what a year it has been! We’ve got a lot of categories this year–two of which were suggested after last year’s poll so I’m putting them in this year.
- Favorite new history/genealogy/social criticism paper by Miles from 2019.
- Favorite new physics paper by Miles from 2019.
- Favorite new guest paper from 2019.
- Favorite art/counter-criticism paper by Miles of all time.*
- Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2019.**
- Worst crisis actor of 2019.
- Event or topic that you most want to see Miles or a guest writer tackle (history, genealogy, hoaxed event, even science).
Leave your vote in comments.*** Or you can use the “Contact” link above to e-mail them to me. You don’t have to vote for all categories but please number your votes corresponding to the categories above. I’m going to leave voting open for a week. Votes cast after Tuesday night January 7 at 11:59pm EST will not be counted!
Happy New Year everybody!!
* By art/counter-criticism I mean his papers on artistic technique and also his criticism of modern art and modern art critics. Most of these papers are over ten years old, but not all of them. I would say if you haven’t read much of these, probably best to abstain from voting in this category.
** Does not have to be an event that Miles or his guest writers covered.
*** Votes for papers updated in 2019 that were published in previous years will not be counted.
Alright, the votes are in and have been tallied! I only got a couple of votes via e-mail, but they did not swing anything. I simply went through the comments and tallied the votes myself, so you are free to check my work. Here are the winners:
Favorite history/genealogy/social criticism paper of 2019. This was super, super close. It started out strongly in favor of one paper but then as the vote went on the winner caught momentum and finally edged out the second place finisher. It was quite gripping. But I guess you had to be there. The top two finishers were far and away the leaders of the pack, with 21 and 20 votes each.
- The Spirit and the Muse
- The Battle of France
- The Death of Mozart
Favorite science paper of 2019. Also neck-in-neck there for awhile:
- Solar Minimum Blues
- The Cause of Gravity, the Next Chapter
- Tie between ‘Dark Matter is Light’ and ‘Faraday and the Arago Effect.’
I voted for the Cause of Gravity Next Chapter. I may have given the Solar Minimum an unfair advantage because some people were not very specific when they mentioned a solar cycle paper, so I put those votes together under the Solar Minimum paper. I actually think the most important solar cycle paper this year was ‘The Latest on Solar Cycles.’ As for the gravity paper, I have definitely had difficulty getting my head around it, though I can recognize its importance. I would love to see Miles reconcile this new theory with his unified field equations where he assigned gravity to radius and charge to density. If they are both fundamentally aspects of charge, then how can you assign a charge effect solely to radius? Shouldn’t charge density both above and below, so to speak, matter?
Favorite guest paper of 2019. We were treated to a bumper crop this year, weren’t we? Here are the top 3:
- Iran’s Jewish Rulers
- Jewish Pirates
- The Dunblane Hoax
- Honorable mention: Christchurch Hoax
Favorite art/counter-criticism paper by Miles of all time. The winners in this category were not really the genre I had in mind. I have a sense that many of Miles’ current readers are less familiar with this part of his oeuvre. So I’m going to include some links to some of these lesser-known papers that received some votes.
- Money Laundering and the Art Market.
- Mr. Turner
- The Stolen Century
- Worth reading: An Artist’s Statement, Nietzsche contra Modern Art, The Art of the Last Man, Balls in a Basket, New Realism, The Many Failures of Modernism, Modernism is Fascism, Chance Abutmenting, A Nation of Scabs, and A Return to the Hockney-Falco Thesis.
Silliest/Most Absurd Hoaxed Event of 2019.
- The London Bridge Attack (Narwhal tusks and all).
- Tie between the Christchurch shooting/video and the Trump Impeachment.
- Global Warming/Climate Change.
- Honorable mentions: Epstein “suicide,” James Stern (Black Jewish neo-NAZI story), and the
fakefirst image of a black hole.
Worst Crisis Actor of 2019 award goes to: Greta Thunberg by a landslide!
Topics You Want to See Tackled by Miles or a Guest Writer. This is a long list, but I’m going to post it here (in the order in which they appeared) in the hopes that Miles or one of his readers (including you!) will want to take a crack:
| Dinosaurs |
| Music Industry Rock Genre |
| Evolution |
| Chilean Miners Rescue |
| Indian reservation gambling |
| Michael Jordan |
| Further exploration of spirit and the muse |
| At what level in the hierarchy is the big picture known / How much are the families “read in” |
| Easter rising |
| Origins of humanity |
| Origins of universe |
| Before the Phoenicians |
| 5G |
| More on how solar cycles affect our health |
| Anything music industry related |
| Bayreuth and the Wagner Family |
| More on country music |
| The numerous anarchist attacks in France at the end of the 19th century (including the alleged assassination of President Sadi Carnot in 1894). |
| Jordan Maxwell |
| John Denver |
| Danny/Marlo Thomas |
| Plane hijackings from Cuba in the 60s |
| Dalai Lama |
| Tony Blair |
| Ariana Grande concert in Manchester |
| Radiohead |
| The Great Grand Jewish Revolt of Trajan’s reign |
| Jack the Ripper |
| The Beatles and Adorno |
| The ACE study by Kaiser Permanente |
| Connections between the Climate Change hoax, the Club of Rome, Agenda 21, Gaia Hypothesis, The University of Peace and Costa Rica. In a word: Maurice Strong. |
| The break up of the First Triumvirate of the Roman Republic – was Crassus’ death in his Parthian campaign faked? |
| Genghis Khan’s campaign against Khwarezmia was launched after his caravan was massacred by the governor of Otrar, claiming that the caravan was a conspiracy against the empire. Was this a false flag? |
| The Holocaust |
| University of Texas clock tower shooting |
| The House of Saud |
| I’d really like to see some kind of genealogy / names index or family tree incorporating the PTB and the Families, to include the people outed in the papers. |
| a comprehensive hit on any of Richard Branson, the Attenborough’s, Jeremy Corbyn, George Michael |
| The wars in Korea and Vietnam. What were they really about and what really happened? |
| The alternative scene: Jordan Maxwell (real name Russel J. Pine), Project Camelot (Kerry Lynn Cassidy and formerly also Bill Ryan), Richard Hoagland, Miles Johnston and his Bases Project, Simon Parkes, Peter Paget, John Lear, Bob Scott Lazar, Dolores Cannon, Ashyana Dean and David Wilcock. |
| Cat Stevens (not his real name), Jeff Lyn ELO (came up with Out of the Blue in one weekend apparently, minor spook year 1977), maybe Cassius Clay |
| Elucidate how this thing works so well for them and some counterexamples (used to be Hitler) that did not start their brilliant careers as sock puppets. |
| Science fraud for the most mafia of all industies. That probably takes us into biology, pharmacology and more so vaccines since that is the profit center for the most profitable exploitative endeavor ever. |
| An attempt to explain how healers channel energy with their hands. Are human hands capable of amplifying and/or focusing the the charge field? How does this actually work? |
| How could the charge field be channeled/blocked to reduce the effect of gravity pull. I want to fly! |
| The Farsight institute |
| Mental health – How to try to keep sane in an increasingly insane world |
| Fetus development and speculations on how the charge field might directly affect different genereations and how conception date might play a role |
| A take on Cicero from a genealogy and a Phonecian angle. |
| Guidelines on how to create a non-fudged Solar Chart |
| A continuation of the “Battery Circuit”/”A/C Current” series focusing on home wiring and electronics/ appliances; more exposing of philosophers set up to misdirect and those who may in fact be somewhat sincere; Bogart (He has always been a favorite but… I know the drill and have seen the substantial ties to the peerage through guest writers) |
| I’d especially like to see the two anti-popes, Roncalli and Montini, and especially the fake pope Karol Wojtyla |
| To out the group calling itself Opus Dei |
| Hellen Keller |
| Marie Curie |
| Our true history as humans. |
| Iran & claims of torpedoing of tankers from Norway & Japan |
| Karl Von Reichenbach, Antonio Meucci, Nathan Stubblefield, Nikola Tesla, and Thomas Henry Moray is on my mind right now because of reading the book “Lost Science” by Gerry Vassilatos. |
| William (Bill) Cooper- his bio reads like a classic spook, and he was at the very least gullible on some points, but he always read as inherently honest to me. Been struggling with this one for a long time |
| A full examination and exposure of the 27 club |
| A paper on all these fake leaders in the conspiracy movement or what you call it. |
| Connection between gravity and ‘Moment of Inertia’ bears exploration |
| Reincarnation |
| Whether the molecular dissociation of the steel and concrete in the twin towers has anything to do with a disruption of the charge binding the atoms together |
| Q Anon |
| Maybe a sequel to The Spirit & the Muse paper; maybe by connecting it with one of your earlier papers: “Is Time Travel Possible?”. In this paper, faster beings (could be a function of charge, fluctuations in charge or some charge effect) could help us with suggestions about the future by interacting with us if we personally notice their interaction, but we can’t see them because they move so fast. Maybe this could be one, of many explanations, for the phenomenon of intuition. |
| What exactly is the nature of the photon ‘particle’ is. Is it something physical? It has a mass, but would there be such a thing as the rest mass of a photon (something material) or is that photon mass only a consequence of its speeds (linear, spins)? |
Cutting Through the Fog 
Okay then:
1….. Favourite history/genealogy/social criticism paper by Miles from 2019.
Click to access anal.pdf
[Cambridge Analytica]
2….. Favourite physics paper by Miles from 2019.
Click to access arago.pdf
[The Arago effect]
3….. Favourite guest paper from 2019.
Click to access iran.pdf
[Iran’s Jewish rulers]
4….. Favourite art/counter-criticism paper by Miles of all time.
Click to access leigh.pdf
[Turner]
5….. Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2018.
Click to access stern2.pdf
[Nazi leader gives the keys to a Black Jew, James Stern.]
6….. Worst crisis actor.
Greta Thunberg!
Click to access greta.pdf
7….. Event or topic that you most want to see Miles or a guest writer tackle (history, genealogy, hoaxed event, even science).
Biggest DINOSAURS real or hoax?
And if you think my daft dinosaur names are uncalled for, how about these ones… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanosauria
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Custer Hoax
Solar Minimum
Ancient Spooks V
Mr. Turner
Nashville Waffle House Shooting
Greta Thunberg
Music Industry Rock Genre
LikeLiked by 1 person
Greg, technically the Custer Hoax paper is not from 2019, it is an update. I did not state it explicitly, but I think updates to papers published in previous years are not candidates for voting. Feel free to change your vote. This one will not be counted. Though you’re right — it’s a great paper!
As for the Rock genre, I would look at his paper on Elvis and also a guest paper on Gender-Bender Pop projects. Also Bob Dylan’s real link to the Rolling Stones.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry Josh I see now where it says update so i’ll change it to The Battle Of France.
Yes the Elvis and Dylan ones were fantastic reads. Would like to see more of the rock legends debunked eventually.
LikeLike
I guess you saw the Clapton paper of this year?
LikeLike
Right, and also the one on Jim Morrison, “Opening Doors.”
LikeLike
Yes a big thanks on Clapton and especially Morrison! I read them plus I think we have more than a few musicians among the commenters here. Maybe some that that almost “made it” but realized the gate to success in the music biz is deep and wide. Yet turn on rock radio now and it’s nothing but noise and programmed electronic drum beats.Keep them coming!
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
I reinstated the numbers, Lewis. On evolution, see here: http://mileswmathis.com/evol.pdf
One upshot of that paper is that the debate over evolution is another case of creating two extreme positions (Darwinian evolution vs. creationism) where both positions are misdirection. Yes, there are problems with the mainstream theory of evolution, and tinkering at the edges won’t solve them. But they want us to think that creationism is the only alternative. But it isn’t!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Appreciated, Josh!
Darwin wasn’t even the Beagle’s science officer, so he was always a spooky fellow with rich rellies. Family names list —
https://famouskin.com/surname-index.php?name=38646+charles+darwin
LikeLiked by 1 person
Josh…..Evolution is fake, Dinos are fake, are the creamy nougat center of the flat earth cuckoo cookie. Of course, considering the wide brush strokes they paint there are surely some issues people could find with ” All that has been claimed ” That is not a scientific argument though. Evolution is easy to prove, Dinos are easy to prove. Google sauropod tracks found in Western Australia 2017 if you want to see that this ground has been, “well covered.” Study anachronisms of the plant world, plants that miss the Megafauna. This is beyond silly. Now, please excuse me while I go sit at the base of the volcano to await the return of Xenu and the Galactic Federation. JFC!
LikeLike
The Ancient Spooks, Phoenician series was mind blowing.
I’d like to see the Country Music series continued, that got off to a really strong start.
LikeLiked by 3 people
1: The Spirit and the Muse
2: Solar Minimum Blues
3: The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald was Faked.
4: Either “What I Finally Understood” or “Robert Anton Wilson: Spooky Baby”, but probably the former. The one on RAW I’m pretty sure was the first paper I ever read and it exploded my mind from the inside out. Why? I didn’t read much as a child, but I did happen to pick up a copy of “Quantum Psychology” where he details how the word “is” is a useless word that damages our ability to communicate, or some horseshit. Anyway, when I read Miles’ destruction of this entire line of thought, I was hooked thereon after. I’ll paste the paragraph below:
“”Is”, “is.” “is”—the idiocy of the word haunts me. If it were abolished, human thought might begin to make sense. I don’t know what anything “is”; I only know how it seems to me at this moment.”
That is from the Historical Illuminatus Chronicles. Wilson wanted to purge all forms of the verb “to be” from the language. Seriously. That wouldn’t be very convenient, would it? It would cause untold confusion, right? Precisely. That was the goal. Just as we saw in my recent paper on The Matrix, the spooks have been trying to dismantle reality for millennia, and still are. Remember how we saw Plato selling you the idea that this world was only a shadow on a cave wall, and how Kant repeated the same idea—teaching you that everything could be divided into noumena and phenomena. Phenomena were “how things seem to me at this moment”, while noumena composed the reality behind that. In the 20th century, they made the same split, but then threw out the noumena, teaching you only the phenomena existed. This had the effect of disconnecting you from any reality. There was no truth, only appearance. Again, this is very useful to the governors, since it immediately disempowers the governed. If you think there is no reality, your ability to make judgments is decimated. They still make judgments, since they don’t believe this crap; but they want you to believe it. They want you to believe there is no truth, since it takes the ground out from under you. You are swimming in quicksand at that point. You will do nothing but waffle the rest of your life. So while appearing to tell you something profound there, Wilson has actually flipped the world on you. It is not the word “is” that is idiotic, it is his project to remove it from the language that is idiotic. It is a cloaked destruction of language itself. In this way it ties into the Buckminster Fuller project, which we looked at in a recent paper. There we saw Fuller doing the same thing, destroying language and meaning with idiotic neologisms like omniself-regenerative. He also recommended we ditch the words “up” and “down”, claiming we had no innate understanding of those directions. I don’t know about you, but I have lots of experience of those directions and understand them perfectly well. I would not like to lose them
5: Not sure
6: Not sure
7: Not sure
LikeLike
My favorite Miles Mathis story for 2019 is The Battle of France. It’s a huge story and it will only get bigger as he unravels the greatest fake of all time.
THESIS: Hitler was an actor, put into place by British Intelligence to organize Germany to attack Russia. England and France cooperated with Germany to fake a “soft invasion” of France, in which nothing of any consequence happened except that it opened up a vast area for the Americans and English forces to assemble in secret for the future D-Day. This plan was put into place after WWI failed. The WWII invasion of Germany began along the Maginot Line, which was put in place in order to allow the Allies to marshal their forces in complete secrecy and with the complete cooperation of the German military. The entire area along the Maginot Line was depopulated and staged for the military exercises, which were then reported as actual battles. It was called the “zone interdite” and was closed to civilians.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed Battle of France, the impossible speed of conquering Paris and the repeated use of the Ardennes Forest invasion path not covered by the Maginot Line shows that history is repeatedly fraudulent, and there is not need to invent new narratives because recycling it is so efficient, i can now see why sequels in Movies also work so well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
zone interdite sounds like reverse Cordone Sanitaire similar to what is said happened to downtown during 9/11
LikeLike
Interesting theory. It makes me wonder about other “DMZs” around the globe, like the North/South Korean border, which has seen many decades of fishy events now looking back on it.
LikeLike
And Savoie is in the DMZ, how surprising…
I didn’t know that, but it brings another light on the “plateau des glieres” events of resistance and fightings!
There is a cemetery in “Morette” near Thônes… and a war museum of course… impossible to forget the war when you live here 😦
french presidents are used to come on the plateau to make the show every summer… they speak about to build another memorial there….
In a country where more and more people have Alzheimer, our lovely politics want us to remember… remember the show, remember the Shoah and stay shocked !
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquis_des_Glières
Of course, at work, there is a meetingroom called Tom Morel !
you can flee but not escape
LikeLike
Josh, I am assuming that you meant 2019 in number 5?
LikeLike
Doh! Yes, I did. Fixed it. Thanks!
LikeLike
chris watts case
LikeLike
hey josh can you add this to the list of topics that miles or a guest can cover? please? i forgot to # it with 7 when i posted the original comment.
LikeLike
Best paper: Mozart- Simple, direct- Logical- solved-
LikeLike
1 Battle of France
2 Not my thing
3 Hungerford & Dunblane hoaxes
4 Not my thing
5 Too many to choose from but climate change is up there.
6 Greta Thurnberg
7 2010 Chilean miners rescue – I thought Miles might have covered this before, but if he has I can’t find it.
LikeLike
Thanks, Chris. He did the Thai kids caught in the cave, but not the Chilean miners.
LikeLike
I must admit the Thai cave rescue fooled me for a while.
LikeLike
The Battle of France.
Solar Minimum Blues.
Iran’s Jewish Leaders.
N/A
Trump impeachment.
Joe Biden (is he a crisis actor?) If he doesn’t count, then Greta Thunberg.
Indian reservation gambling or Michael Jordan. Both have military ties. You also wouldn’t expect them to be cryptos.
LikeLike
Category 1 – 4/14/19, The Spirit and the Muse.
Category 2 -Solar Cycles, Solar Minimum Blues
Category 3 –
3/11/19, Jewish Pirates.
6/3/19, Iran’s Jewish Rulers.
Category 4 – 2/4/14, I Would Like to File a Suspicious Transaction Report on the entire 20th century
Category 5 – The perpetual “rags to riches” stories of those born rich.
Category 6 – George W. Bush “The Pet Goat” 2001
Category 7 – Two possible subjects: 1. MM’s best guess at what level of the Phoenician hierarchy the big picture is actually entirely known. 2. Deeper exploration of “The Spirit and the Muse” and the idea that photon(s) are the “energizer bunnies” that run our bodies and make up our souls.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, “I Would Like to File a Suspicious Transaction Report on the entire 20th century” was an incredible paper, I agree.
LikeLike
Josh, I apologize for category 6. I thought it said worst crisis actor and I don’t recall seeing a year afterwards. But now I see that it says 2019 so I’ll go with Greta.
LikeLike
#1 – Battle of France
#2 – Solar minimum
#3 – 3 Chords pt 1, yee ha!
#4 – New Realism
#5 – Climate Change Hoax
#6 – Chelsea Manning – Is it a Bird, is it a Pain, no it’s another gay Jewish actor
#7 – Easter Rising
LikeLike
1) battle of france
2) –
3) who is greta thunberg
4) –
5) the Fire of Notre Dame de Paris, on April the 15th, as anniversary of Lincoln assassination and Titanic sinking,
6) Greta
7) I would like to know the point of view or the theories of MM about :
==> an alternative theory about the origins of humanity
==> a theory about the creation of the universe
happy new year and great new decade to you
LikeLiked by 1 person
My biggest was The battle of France.
A tidbit.
The Phoneicians are mentioned in the Oera Linda book as a group of mixed race people.
LikeLike
At first, I would like thank Miles for his great work for these past years and all participants of this site. These are my Miles favourite papers from 2019 :
Battle of France (of course, being French !)
Solar minimum with his different updates
Jewish Pirates
Modernism is fascism
Death of Mozart was faked
Greta Thunberg (while I think she is under mind control since her birth…)
5G !
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry, Josh, I typed numbers (1. – 2. etc) for each choice, but they didn’t appear when I posted…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The same for me as a French reader…
LikeLike
Hello Thibault ! Nice to see you here 🙂
LikeLike
The Spirit and the Muse – This is one of the most important papers Miles has written, perhaps the best. That kind of plain, real talk in spiritual matters is sorely needed in today’s world.
The Solar Cycles – any of them. I’ve learn this past year that ambient charge, changes in charge flow in the solar system, and seasonal changes really affect my physical and mental condition. Discovering this is almost as important as # 1 above and its something I believe the real (if they exist) astrologists have intuited on for generations.
This really belongs to Jewish Pirates since this one was the final inspiration to write my paper Dances with Spooks, but Iran’s Jewish Rulers gave me the ammunition to completely tear ancient history to shreds including the Silk Road Empires over the summer, and am now working on a second paper. Its a tie.
I Would Like to File a Suspicious Transaction Report on the Entire 20th Century. Its like the art criticism version of the Tate paper: thorough and devastating. It’s been a long time since Miles has written specifically on art criticism, but many of his older papers are worth checking out if anyone out there hasn’t.
Oh gods where to begin and what to choose. They’re all equally horrible. If I had to choose.. probably the launch of the red Tesla into space.. then allegedly floating all the way to Mars and back. I think that was this year? Musk & Co are always coming up with a fresh new hustle and its utterly absurd that SpaceX is allowed to exist. It really makes me question EVERYONE and EVERYTHING involved in the space industry. Not that I really care. Most of the space crap is just stealing from treasury that’s needed for far more important societal problems.
I usually stay away from watching crisis actors in the media since I don’t like to being lied straight to my face. The kid actors always give it away, including Greta.
More research on the Solar Cycles and how it effects our health.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah WordPress’ behind the scenes auto-formatting is really annoying sometimes. I had numbers in front of those paragraphs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Solid choice, my friend. I chose the same!
LikeLike
My vote for best paper 2019 is the recent enna…..
Click to access ennea.pdf
I get it now that most if not all his-story is faked but I enjoy seeing these pathetic no accounts getting exposed in ‘real time’.
Now THAT’s ENTERTAINMENT!
The Norway expose is brilliant also imo
and guest writer goes to the Phoenician papers
I enjoy your sense of humor Miles. Keep it up because in the moment these clowns are hiding behind and are shielding from the masses seems to be a big comic laugh!.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Spirit and the Muse !!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Probably the best one, his personal pov given imo with The Battle for France next
LikeLike
The Dunblane Hoax Jewish Pirates. Christchurch Hoax. Port Arthur. Iran’s Jewish Rulers. Greta Thunberg. The Battle of France. Fake Norway Massacre. Greensboro Non Massacre The Spirit and the Muse
LikeLike
goyguy33 I appreciate your enthusiasm but I don’t know what to do with these votes given that you’ve voted for the same category more than once apparently
LikeLike
France
Cool moonlight (2018 I know – what is ‘time’ anyways?)
Ancient spooks
Money laundering
Dolly’s braces
Greta Thun’berg’
Anthing and everything music industry related.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Egg, cool moonlight doesn’t count because it’s not from 2019.
LikeLike
No worries. Thanks.
Haven’t dug into the science side yet.
But I did experiment with a laser thermometer years ago and this paper really spun me around. 😉
Great poll idea btw.
LikeLike
miles you are seriously intelligent. i look forward to your updates.
my personal favourites are the musicians. please do more posts on their fakery!
happy new year!
LikeLike
Battle of France (most importantly)
Miles or a guest writer should do Bayreuth and the Wagner Family.
Richard Wagner was born to an ethnic German family in Leipzig, who lived at No 3, the Brühl (The House of the Red and White Lions) in the Jewish quarter.
He was the ninth child of Carl Friedrich Wagner, who was a clerk in the Leipzig police service, police actuary with the expectation of the position of police chief of Leipzig, a spook in French service.
Wagner’s father Carl died of typhus six months after Richard’s birth. [I think: he faked his death (23. 11.1813 Leipzig) after Napoleon lost the Battle of Leipzig 16–19 October 1813. He could no longer stay in Leipzig.]
Luise Wagner, * 1805 † 1872, Schauspielerin, ⚭ 1828 Friedrich Brockhaus,* 1800 † 1865,
Ottilie Wagner, * 1811 † 1883, ⚭ 1836 Hermann Brockhaus, * 1806 † 1877,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brockhaus_Enzyklop%C3%A4die
Georg Klindworth, born Johann Georg Heinrich Klindworth on 16 April 1798 in Göttingen, Germany, was a nineteenth-century German diplomat and intelligence agent employed by several European leaders and princes.
Klindworth’s “illegitimate” daughter Agnes Street-Klindworth (1825–1906) was a lover of the musician Franz Liszt with whom she had a vast letter correspondence.
On 22 April the following year he tried to persuade the publisher Friedrich Arnold Brockhaus, as an agent provocateur, for the anonymous publication of a radical liberal-democratic article, but the plan failed and Klindworth had to leave Berlin after his dismissal on 4 May.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Klindworth
Karl Klindworth (25 September 1830 – 27 July 1916) was a German composer, virtuoso pianist, conductor, violinist and music publisher. He was one of Franz Liszt’s pupils and later one of his closest disciples and friends, being also on friendly terms with composer Richard Wagner, of whom he was an admirer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Klindworth
Winifred Marjorie Williams was born in Hastings, England, to John Williams, a journalist and critic, and his wife, née Emily Florence Karop. Winifred lost both her parents before the age of two and was initially raised in a number of homes. Eight years later she was adopted by a distant German relative of her mother, Henrietta Karop, and her husband Karl Klindworth, a musician and a friend of Richard Wagner.
In 1923, Winifred met Adolf Hitler, who greatly admired Wagner’s music. When Hitler was jailed for his part in the Munich Beer Hall Putsch, Winifred sent him food parcels and stationery on which Hitler’s autobiography Mein Kampf may have been written. In the late 1930s, she served as Hitler’s personal translator during treaty negotiations with Britain.
Although Winifred remained personally faithful to Hitler, she denied that she had ever supported the Nazi party. Her relationship with Hitler grew so close that by 1933 there were rumours of impending marriage (there were similar rumours about her love for English novelist Hugh Walpole).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winifred_Wagner
Walpole returned to Petrograd in February 1916. He moved into Somov’s flat, and his Anglo-Russian Propaganda Bureau began work. … Walpole remained at the bureau for the rest of 1916 and most of 1917, witnessing the February Revolution. He wrote an official report on events for the Foreign Office, and also absorbed ideas for his fiction. On 7 November he left, missing the Bolshevik Revolution, which began on that day. He was appointed to a post at the Foreign Office in its Department of Information, headed by John Buchan.
Walpole was a keen music lover and when in 1920 he heard a new tenor at the Proms he was much impressed and sought him out. Lauritz Melchior became one of the most important friendships of his life, and Walpole did much to foster the singer’s budding career. Wagner’s son Siegfried engaged Melchior for the Bayreuth Festival in 1924 and succeeding years. Walpole attended, and met Adolf Hitler, then recently released from prison after an attempted putsch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Walpole
Cosima Wagner (born Francesca Gaetana Cosima Liszt; 24 December 1837 – 1 April 1930) was the illegitimate daughter of the Hungarian pianist and composer Franz Liszt and Marie d’Agoult.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosima_Wagner
Marie Catherine Sophie, Comtesse d’Agoult (31 December 1805 – 5 March 1876), was a Franco-German romantic author and historian, known also by her pen name, Daniel Stern.
Marie was born in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, as Marie Catherine Sophie de Flavigny, the daughter of Alexander Victor François, Vicomte de Flavigny (1770–1819), a footloose émigré French aristocrat, and his wife Maria Elisabeth Bethmann (1772–1847), a German banker’s daughter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_d%27Agoult
The Bethmann (/ˈbɛtmɑːn/ BET-mahn) family has been remarkable for the high proportion of its males who succeeded at mercantile or financial endeavors. This family trait began in medieval northern Germany and continued with the Bethmann bank which Johann Philipp Bethmann (1715–1793) and Simon Moritz Bethmann (1721–1782) founded in 1748 and soon catapulted into the foremost ranks of German and European banks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethmann_family
Theobald Theodor Friedrich Alfred von Bethmann-Hollweg (29 November 1856 – 1 January 1921) was a German politician who was the Chancellor of the German Empire from 1909 to 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theobald_von_Bethmann-Hollweg
In German, but interesting:
https://www.wagner200.com/biografie/biografie-familie.html
If Miles will do it, it will become the best of 2020. Sorry, unfortunately my english is too bad to write it myself.
Sincerely yours
Wolfgang Waldner
LikeLiked by 3 people
Wolfgang, you should write it, and I will add to it. You already have half a paper right there.
LikeLike
I look forward to more of guest writer writing guesses on the country music scene. Homer and Jethro excepted, they are OK in my book since they always revealed it’s all a joke.
LikeLike
Hello Josh, my choices for 2019 :
Dolly’s Braces (on the mandela effect).
…
Khashoggi.
…
The video of Chritchurch.
Greta Thunberg, inevitably.
The numerous anarchist attacks in France at the end of the 19th century (including the alleged assassination of President Sadi Carnot in 1894).
LikeLike
The spirit and the muse
Solar minimum blues
Three chords and the truth
Mr. Turner
El Paso
Greta
Jordan Maxwell
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
Norway
Christchurch
This is not standout event, but when I hear about a “measles epidemic” is New York City, or something like that, I now think “fake.”
Would like to see…
John Denver
Danny Thomas/Marlo Thomas
Plane highjackings to and from Cuba in the 60s
As someone upthread mentioned, I would like Miles to explain how he thinks it works, being in the families. How much are they read in?
I have dipped my toes in the science papers this year, and they felt fine! After reading about the charge field, the grand solar minimum (no sports records), gravity, and such, I kept thinking of Bob Beamon. Maybe Miles has some thoughts.
LikeLike
WordPress removed the numbers, That was 1, 3, 5, 7 for me.
LikeLike
Bob Beamon: 1968 was solar max, and maybe Bob caught a little charge eddy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could more charge cause more lift?
LikeLike
John Denver would be interesting – another one from a military family. He was also involved in the Werner Erhard/est LGAT cult in the 1970s.
LikeLike
Could someone post a link to I Would Like to File a Suspicious Transaction Report on the entire 20th century? I don’t see it in the Best of the Art Essays. I’m not sure I have read this one. Great title!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Click to access launder.pdf
Great paper.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Work of genius that one.
LikeLike
That is the one paper that never finds resistance when I describe its argument.
LikeLike
Ephing A. It takes a moment of meditation to soak in how sly the situaion really is. What’s up is down and the reverse. Just wow.
LikeLike
Thanks for the link. I certainly did read that one. I didn’t know the title. Thought of it as “the Money Laundering paper.” 🙂
LikeLike
Category 7
The Dalai Lama, Tony Blair, the Manchester Arena/Ariana Grande event UK 2017
LikeLike
I have already mentioned Blair as a mole from the families, and a big fake. So is the Dalai Lama, though I agree it would be interesting to fully research him.
LikeLike
Recall the book and movie, The Ghost Writer, that attempts to paint Blair as a manipulated pawn of the CIA. It seems quaint now. Of course it was another piece of misdirection away from the fact that they’re all spooks and scions of the Phoeny family lines: the writer; the filmmaker; the actors; the politicians and family members portrayed there-in etc etc etc
LikeLike
#1… Dolly’s Braces. A smoking gun proving that we’re being f’ed with
#2… Von Neumann the Fraud
#3… Hungerford. The unstoppable Ivor Jackson!
#4… Favorite counter-criticism: Stephen Hawking imposter. I have a soft spot for this one because it was the first Miles paper I discovered, two years ago.
#4b… Favorite art. We don’t talk much about the art papers, which is too bad. Some of the old polemics are both very informative and hilarious. Here’s one of my favorites: “Chance Abutmenting” http://mileswmathis.com/schjeld.html . A quote:
“Since Ryman’s canvases are complete nullities in every way, Schjeldahl is forced to begin describing the frames to us from the start; and the frames are, of course, not worth mentioning either. They are “oak, cherry, or maple.” Astonishing. Wood frames, you say. But wait, the white paint “bleeds across the abutments between surface and frame.” Doubly delicious, we are supposed to believe, since we get a big word like “abutments”. Abutments, yummy. And then we are told about the walls and the lights. Apparently reflections are caused by such things, and the artist gets credit for that. The critic can even see himself! The artist also gets credit for poorly constructed frames, “slight separations at their corner joints” which “register as chance elements of drawing.”
“You can already see that no one but me bothers to read these reviews in search of any sense. Supposing that some people must do what they call reading of these reviews of Schjeldahl, I can only imagine that the words never really register as denotative or connotative, in the linguistic or semiotic sense. A few ideas already in the head of the reader are drummed awake by familiar words and phrases, but the bulk of the sentences and paragraphs must simply run through the brain, like light beer through the bladder.”
#5… Jeffrey Epstein fake death
#6… Jussie Smollett
#7… Radiohead. One of my favorite bands, but now I fear they are too spooky. Like the Beatles, they seem to have a lot of innate talent to go along with their heavy promotion. Also, there may be signs that they are not completely accepting of their role (e.g. Thom Yorke’s nervous breakdown; or them bypassing the labels when disseminating their music), but maybe this is all theater.
LikeLiked by 1 person
1 I am going to choose The One About Henry Ford — it was important to take down this fake icon of truth. “History is Bunk” — you don’t say, Mr Ford.
2 Twas either THE gravity paper or the one entitled “How can a Star be Older than the Universe?”. I chose the latter for personal reasons — I was deeply moved by the vastness of time that it implied and it consequences for our understanding of history. Obviously the Gravity paper is the ground breaking one but I vote for calling out those dense scientists.
3 Iran’s Jewish rulers — it was all there right under our noses.
4 The one with a picture of Joyce and Pound being lorded over by a British Spook. Miles uses logic and evidence to devastating effect, blasting away any remaining doubts as to the levels of fakery we have endured. The Stolen Century, that’s the one.
5 Dolly’s Braces because it highlighted the bizarro gaslighting project that is the Mandela Effect. The discussion on CttF revealed many possibilities as to how the spooks are managing it, e.g. shooting two versions of a scene.
6 Greta will do.
7 The Great Grand Jewish Revolt of Trajan’s reign in which hordes of Eastern Mediterranean Jews killed 100,000s of non-Jews who then managed to slaughter 100,000s of Jews in response. By coincidence, Trajan had the Roman Army fighting in Parthia. The Jewish horde was then banished to Judea — up to your room, you naughty horde. The destruction wrought apparently cleared away quite a lot of the old Classical and Hellenistic sanctuaries. Where in world did all these Jews come from? Was a Roman Empire or a Jewish Empire…oh wait.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, my 5 is an “ongoing event” ;P
LikeLike
And 3 should say “right under their noses”.
LikeLike
The Spirit & the Muse
I’ve been waiting my whole life to finally read what I didn’t know how to put into words. Thank you Miles.
LikeLike
I just read about Gervais’ new Netflix show. It will be about a guy who can say whatever he wants because he has lost everything. Remind you of anyone?
LikeLike
Whoops, apparently I was led to an old article, since the show has been out since last March. I have never done Netflix and never will, so someone can tell me about the show.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I was reading the wiki on’t when you asked the question.
LikeLike
I find the timing and message of the show suspicious, since it is about being nice and NOT saying what you want. On the surface, that looks like good advice, but if you apply it to me and my readers, and go a bit deeper, the message is a veiled “don’t rock the boat”. Since NEtflix is a known CIA front, I don’t see this as an accident. Gervais may want the audience to equate the nasty daily one-liners of his character with my broader critiques, seeing them both as shallow whining and self-pity rather than as a serious response to real problems. Gervais has always sold himself as a maverick, but it is clear he is just another brick in the wall.
LikeLike
1- Battle of France
2- Solar Minimum
3- Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald / Irans Jewish Rulers
4-
5- Climate Change
6- Greta Thunberg (10 Oscars)
7- I’d like Miles to get to the bottom of Jack The Ripper.
Thank you Miles for ALL of your work! My week isn’t complete until I see a new paper posted on your site. I can actually now see Clearly Thru The Fog.
LikeLike
I have said that the RIpper was created by the London PRess, to create fear, same as now. I can’t remember which paper I said that in, and I only mentioned it in passing.
LikeLike
I remember that. I just can’t find it in my memory right now. There is a new puppy in our house and our feet/socks just can’t escape his biting training right now. 😉
LikeLike
I think ‘ol Jack needs a deeper look…….one of the earlier “Fake Serial Killers.” Also would like to know what you think about Ed Gein.
LikeLike
Gein was fake. All of them are fake.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Would love to know how they could fake something like that in a tiny shit-sack town where everyone knows everyone’s business and the owner of the hardware store (which is still there) ended up gutted and hanging in his kitchen????
LikeLike
Miles, my adobe search in your papers that I have saved has a one line mention of “faked Jack the Ripper” here http://mileswmathis.com/holmes.pdf. Another mention here http://mileswmathis.com/hhholmes.pdf.
LikeLike
Try the Zodiac paper.
LikeLike
Yes, thank you! http://mileswmathis.com/zodiac.pdf
LikeLike
Battle of France
Cause of gravity the next chapter
Iran’s Jewish Rulers
Review of The Painted Word
Recently there was a rehash of the Delhi rape case. Really got on my nerves because this story was surrounded by several other faked rape cases…like a whole week’s worth. Next week all the rapists decided to take a break, because the Matrix.
Shane Nigam. This bozo’s been on the news on account of some manufactured conflict with the film association or something. Supposedly this guy is a flag behind which we youngsters of Kerala are supposed to rally, to get back at the oldsters. Only guy I can think of.
I know these historical papers are hard, but I would like to see one on Jewish, I mean Julius Caesar.
LikeLike
1- Favorite history/genealogy/social criticism paper by Miles from 2019. Battle of France, closely followed by John Major.
2- Favorite physics paper by Miles from 2019. All the Solar Minimum papers.
3- Favorite guest paper from 2019. Easily the Christchurch Hoax by Uncle Owen. Nailed the event more or less as it happened, great work. Unfortunately, all the aims of the hoaxers were achieved, however I see the fake video of the event is now in, at least, it’s fourth iteration as it’s makers and editors continue (and fail) to try and achieve believability.
4- Favorite art/counter-criticism paper by Miles of all time.*. I always liked the “Scabs” paper from a few years back. Still relevant.
5- Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2019.**. Epstein’s ‘death’.
6- Worst crisis actor. Ms Pelosi: her only job was to deliver the death-blow of (fake) impeachment but she dissolved into a kind of incoherent ‘Hilary Derangement Syndrome’ often associated with spooky mind-control programmes. Her bizarrely designed and applied make up also contributed to a picture of complete fakery. Runner-up: Prince Andrew, WTF? Who’s he taking the hit for?
7- Event or topic that you most want to see Miles or a guest writer tackle (history, genealogy, hoaxed event, even science). The Beatles and Adorno story has a certain appeal.
Keep up the great work, every paper provides learning.
LikeLike
Diana’s faked death (but also, ALL of them!!!)
solar minimum blues
ancient spooks V. (that series is mindblowing! more chapters please!)
boycott everything (the take home message to me)
Notre Dame purposely burnt as a managed event
Greta Thunberg
The ACE study by Kaiser Permanente in California– governors inflicted trauma on the populace cripples our ability to reach for liberty; are hospitals doing humans experiments on us the general populace and are they abetting human rights crimes?; why do Jews and Muslims really abstain from pork products… is there human DNA used in domesticating wild boars into cute, smart pigs?
Also, concur with others on wanting papers on 5G and more rock stars, that’d be fantastic.
LikeLike
Joseph Stalin
Solar minimum – extremely interesting and eye opening.
Jewish Pirates – the subject is worth a deeper look, but I was glad to see someone touching it.
The spirit and the muse – I’d say that’s the best Miles paper of 2019, overall.
The Christchurch Hoax
Greta Thunberg by far
The very deep and spooky connections between the Climate Change hoax, the Club of Rome, Agenda 21, Gaia Hypothesis, The University of Peace and Costa Rica. In a word: Maurice Strong.
LikeLike
The Spirit and the Muse. It helped me a lot when I was in a bad place. The Death of Mozart was Faked was also great.
The Arago Effect, for the exposé on Faraday and Fourier. Although Von Neumann the Fraud has some delicious polemic, and I enjoyed the Kuiper Cliff tying together the atomic and planetary scales. I would be interested to see analysis of other mathematical greats like Euler and Gauss. I know Miles has previously mentioned he has little respect for Gauss and a longer paper describing why would be fascinating. Gauss’ motto was pauca sed matura (“few, but ripe”) – I suppose he meant “few, but well fudged”?
Iran’s Jewish Rulers. I enjoy papers that increase our understanding of the breadth of the Phoenician con, rather than just chipping away at the already well-exposed American farce (though of course those are appreciated too). Jewish Pirates and Dances with Spooks were also good for that reason. I think East Asia is an under-explored avenue of research. I have been taking a look at Japan around the time of the Meiji restoration, after Japan was opened to Western trade by Matthew C. Perry in 1853. Plenty of half-Jewish-looking Japanese aristocrats and industrialists were involved in that, including Yasuda Zenjirō, great-grandfather of Yoko Ono.
I Would Like to File a Suspicious Transaction Report on the entire 20th century. Although there are many papers that are incredibly well written – The Art of the Lastman and Nietzsche Contra Modern Art come to mind. Big thanks to Miles for inspiring me to develop my appreciation for classical art. When I was in Europe over the summer I spent a significant amount of time visiting art museums in every city I went to. I spent 7 hours in the Louvre and I don’t think I saw half the works. The one time I upgraded my ticket to include a temporary exhibit of a contemporary artist I was ashamed of myself for having squandered 4 euro so stupidly.
Epstein’s faked death.
Greta Thunberg
I suppose I can use this space to put a some questions I’ve thought of but didn’t think it was appropriate to waste Miles’ time asking.
The break up of the First Triumvirate of the Roman Republic – was Crassus’ death in his Parthian campaign faked? (seems likely to me)
Genghis Khan’s campaign against Khwarezmia was launched after his caravan was massacred by the governor of Otrar, claiming that the caravan was a conspiracy against the empire. Was this a false flag?
I am a rock climber, and the sport is currently receiving a lot of attention from the mainstream, most notably being incorporated into the 2020 Olympics. One of the best rock climbers in the world (certainly one of the most promoted) is Adam Ondra. He is supposedly Czech but looks extremely Jewish. I haven’t been able to find any easy clues, but any research into spookery in rock climbing would be appreciated. On that note, Alex Honnold received a lot of attention for his free solo ascent (no safety gear) of El Capitan in Yosemite. The documentary that was produced (Free Solo, 2018) included some shots that left me questioning how they could have been captured. I’m left wondering if that was a fake too.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mozart – Nissen
LikeLike
The Spirit and the Muse
I’ve read this one more than a couple of times.The paper is beyond Miles’ usual superbly written papers, still forces me to think harder than usual each and every time.
The Cause of Gravity, the Next Chapter
I’m still pounding my head over this one. There was a great discussion about it at Nevyn’s forum, which lasted for quite a while. Great ideas were tossed around and it marked 2019 for me in a special way. I’d be excited if Miles expanded his understanding of gravity with new papers on the subject. The idea of solving the question of gravity is really beyond thrilling.
best guest paper – Jewish Pirates
The Nation of Scabs
The Holocaust, as continuation of WWII theme
LikeLiked by 1 person
7.) As a Texan, Miles absolutely MUST tackle the University of Texas clock tower shooting. All of the clues are on the Wiki page. Read the timeline, and see how much Charles Whitman was supposed to have accomplished over less than 12 hours! Footage exis from the network broadcast. Holes are easy 5o fill.
LikeLike
I spent a few hours looking into the University of Texas clock tower shooting, and yes of course it was fake like all the others. The young couple victims whose unborn child also died were active in the fake SDS, and how likely is that for a real event? I didn’t proceed because I couldn’t find an entertaining angle fast enough, couldn’t fit it into a larger picture worth showing, and the event was fairly minor as they come.
LikeLike
I don’t know why, but when I read “SDS” I immediately thought of the Weather Underground and their bombings, especially of police stations in the 70’s. You can see where I’m going with this…
There was even that FBI agent who said he had ‘infiltrated’ them and was at a meeting where they claimed they had to mass-murder 25 million people who couldn’t be re-educated. LOL
I stumbled across this, which now I want to find and watch since it’s got the “real” people (still free as a bird) talking about their roles,
The Weather Underground
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0343168/
LikeLike
Topic that I most want to see Miles tackle is the ultra-taboo victims-faked topic:
Were the “victims” in ABC’s 9/11 broadcast (taller than each 3.6-meter floor) CGI?
If broadcast was pre-prepared CGI, was WTC thus pre-emptied and “victims” faked?
The 9/11 victims-faked topic seems as ultra-taboo as the Holocaust-victims-faked topic.
Gratitude if Miles can bravely confirm if the war-rationalizing “victims” of 9/11 were indeed faked.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oops, I forgot to link the official broadcast “footage” for Miles to check:
archive (dot) org/details/abc200109111241-1323#review-1477229767
LikeLike
Though in faked events often deaths are minimized, chances are that quite a few people died when the Twin Towers fell unexpectedly, simply from the debris if from nothing else. Much of the famous footage is likely fake, as always.
But whether some or all of the deaths were faked, no airplanes crashed on that day, and that is a more important point to discuss. The very little video evidence we have of crashes makes no physical sense. In particular, the only live footage was video-composited very crudely without computer graphics – the sort of thing you could do with video overlay devices of the era.
This point is worth discussing because it is at the heart of the magic trick. If you can see that this was simply a demolition, much of the mystique of the event falls away and ceases to disturb you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bryan, right on, you’re almost 100% correct. Since you realize it was simply a pre-planned demolition of the WTC complex, with pre-prepared CGI “planes footage” and pre-prepared CGI “victims (4-meter-tall, undeniably taller than each 3.6 meter floor, oops) footage”, logically you should cease to hold on to that final old remaining evidence-less false-belief: namely, that the 101-minute movie contained ANY actual “live footage” of the buildings being demolished.
The pre-planned demolition of the WTC did not require the added risk of even one murder charge, or even one lawsuit, or even one act of revenge from any “angry surviving family member of a victim who was crushed by the debris”, so of course total evacuation of the area was done first, with military smoke machines concurrently and subsequently obscuring all of Manhattan, so while everyone (Manhattan residents, New York residents, surrounding area residents, and the whole world) watched their TVs, the CGI pre-prepared (no-need-for-any-live-compositing-risk) finished-product complete-movie was broadcast showing that physically impossible “volcano-like eruption starting at the top and total steel-beam-dustification moving downward.”
Since you know the “planes” were CGI, and since you know the “4-meter-victims preparing to jump” (as shown at 1:00pm in the official archives linked above) were CGI, it’s time to finally let go of the false belief that the CGI planes and CGI victims were needlessly “composited live, into actual live footage of the building being demolished in a physically impossible way.” The physical impossibility of the towers exploding into dust like that, would require a red-herring wild-goose chase of claiming “Star Wars Direct-Energy-Weapon Laser-Microwave Steel-Dustification technology was used” all in a needless attempt to claim “the footage of the towers coming down was real authentic footage.”
Real actual building demolitions start from the bottom, never from the top. Meaning, the first floor at the bottom is exploded first, then instantly the weight of the building naturally brings the whole remaining building directly down, while the second floor is exploded milliseconds later, while the third floor is exploded milliseconds after, and so and so on (1st floor, 2nd floor, 3rd floor, etc. in perfect sequence all the way up up the final explosives on the top floor) the whole sequence of explosions of a real demolition happens so fast a layman would assume it’s one big instant explosion but actually real demolitions require this bottom-to-top sequence of explosions. Watch real actual demolitions of tall buildings, in slow motion if needed, to see the difference between a real demolition versus the “WTC destruction footage.”
TLDR: When you realize the entire movie was pre-prepared CGI, all of it, even the building-destruction depiction, then the mystique of the event falls away and ceases to disturb you, and you will no longer hold that mistaken belief that “quite a few people died when the Twin Towers fell unexpectedly.”
The problem is Miles still doesn’t realize the entire 101-minute movie was CGI, thus he still doesn’t realize the 10-block area was pre-evacuated, thus he still doesn’t realize nobody was killed during the pre-planned simple normal demolition of the WTC.
I’m hoping Miles someday realizes there’s nothing shameful about admitting (albeit 18 years later than others) the fact that nobody died during the broadcast of that war-initiating 100%-pre-prepared-movie on 9/11.
LikeLike
That is how Simon Shack deliberately undermines his own thesis, i.e. by arguing that the whole show was CGI rather than just the layering in of the planes. It is a classic “anti” stance — tell the truth then crap all over it with a load of…crap. The problem is he went too far because people still know the difference. I spray my anti-anti Spray all over your text…pssssssssssssssssssst….pssssssst…..
LikeLike
Nada0101: Congratulations on having realized the planes were CGI.
The impossibly-tall victims were CGI too: tinyurl (dot) com/4meters
Logically one must admit those 4-meter victims are unreal, correct?
So, now you will say “planes AND victims were inserted real-time.”
“CGI planes, CGI victims, inserted live into real footage of towers.”
But “inserting planes+victims into REAL footage LIVE” = risky way.
They took the safer path of simply pre-preparing the whole movie.
Fantasy “steel-dustification, with top-down demolition” impossible.
Just standard demolition, hidden by smoke, and a complete movie.
The movie they broadcast contains plane+victim+tower anomalies.
After one realizes “planes” fake, one can realize “victims” fake too.
Once you’ve seen the ABC 1pm 4-meter-victims, you’ll understand.
The old “tower-victims” belief is proven false by their 4-meter size.
You’ve admitted: plane-victims fake. Well: tower-victims were too.
The only 9/11 victims were those who died in the subsequent war.
I know this, now you know this, the question is: Miles realized yet?
LikeLike
I watched it as it happened on tv. Fire chief was asked if they would have trouble getting everyone out. He replied that they should have the buildings cleared in less than 30 minutes. So how could there be 3,000 people still in the towers when they collapsed? That conclusion nailed it for me.
All the other impossibilities fell into place one after the other following that realisation.
LikeLike
Why waste a good demolition when you can ‘prophet’ so heavily?
Lol 😉
LikeLike
Good to see Shack’s people are here stirring up trouble. So all the dust was caused by military smoke machines? Is that what you said?
LikeLike
The strange “tower dustification” depicted in the movie broadcast, and the subsequent result of all of Manhattan completely obscured by smoke in the movie broadcast, was an essential part of the movie broadcast, since it matched the fact that all of Manhattan was indeed completely obscured* from the view of New Yorker residents during those hours.
= youtube (dot) com/watch?v=jWq8LDIafqg&t=23
But the original question to you Miles is whether you feel the official broadcast’s depiction of the “4-meter-tall victims” coming out of the 2.2meter windows was somehow “real, and just an explainable optical illusion” in your opinion, or actually proof of the official broadcast being pre-prepared with no actual victims on that day:
tinyurl (dot) com/4meters
archive (dot) org/details/abc200109111241-1323#review-1477229767
Hopefully you can analyze that moment of the official broadcast with your keen eye (seriously), regardless of the opinion of any particular person who has pointed out the as-tall-as-an-entire-floor victim-size discrepancy.
Gratitude.
LikeLike
1….. Favourite history/genealogy/social criticism paper by Miles from 2019.
Battle of France
2….. Favourite physics paper by Miles from 2019.
Cause of Gravity
3….. Favourite guest paper from 2019.
Irans Jewish Rulers
4….. Favourite art/counter-criticism paper by Miles of all time.
Davinci fake
5….. Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2019.
London Bridge attack 2019 (It was dafter than the 2017 one, which is quite an achievement)
6….. Worst crisis actor.
Darryn Frost and his handy Narwhal tusk
7….. Event or topic that you most want to see Miles or a guest writer tackle (history, genealogy, hoaxed event, even science).
The House of Saud (prove they are jews and the house of cards falls)
LikeLike
5….. Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2019.
A close second will be the Iranian general bollox that has just landed… A missile strikes the car, turns the car into a molten lump of metal and makes a crater 2mm deep, then bends the crash barrier around the car. #fuckoffwitcha
LikeLike
Thanks as always Miles, for all your work and insight. Thnaks Josh, for the forum, and thanks to the guest writers too.
It’s always hard to pick favourites from so much quality in all catagories. Here goes….
#1 – Favorite new history/genealogy/social criticism paper by Miles from 2019.
The Norway series. So much more in these than first meets the eye.
#2 – Favorite new physics paper by Miles from 2019.
The Solar Minimum papers. Having read probably three quarters of the science papers now, I can really appreciate it.
#3 – Favorite new guest paper from 2019.
Dunblane. Another ‘knew it’ moment.
#4 – Favorite art/counter-criticism paper by Miles of all time.*
The Stolen Century, and the Money Laundering in the Art Market. Seminal for me.
#5 – Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2019.**
Apart from Greta’s continuing drone, and the rediculousness of Brexit (give me strength), I’m going for “London’s entry for Stupidest story of the year”. They didn’t even try.
#6 – Worst crisis actor of 2019.
Has to be Greta. Though the continued nonsense of Trump, Boris Johnson et al is ridiculous.
#7 – Event or topic that you most want to see Miles or a guest writer tackle:
I’d really like to see some kind of genealogy / names index or family tree incorporating the PTB and the Families, to include the people outed in the papers. A mammoth task to be sure, and I don’t know if it counts within the question?
If not, a comprehensive hit on any of Richard Branson, the Attenborough’s, Jeremy Corbyn, George Michael (his sister recently died on xmas day – 3 years after him – reaaally!!).
Most of all, the Bible.
Best wishes to all.
LikeLike
Jimi Hendrix 12/28, since I have listened a lot to Hendrix.
Still, The Lost Century, where Mathis broke new ground exposing the Emperor wasn’t Wearing New Clothes.
Continue no. 4 above, poking holes into the “Myth’ of Vincent van Gogh regardless if one likes ‘his’ work or not. My nebulous opinion is ‘he’ was a project of many hands
.
A red flag is Johanna Gezina van Gogh-Bonger-Cohen. Mother was H.L. Weissman. She was first married to Vincent van Gogh’s brother, Theodor, who died at 33, then Johan Cohan Gosschaulk. He painted her portrait making her look like the imaginary love-child of Kim Jong-un and Yoko Ono. Johan Cohen’s ancestry runs throughout with Soloman/Levjs and Levj/Solomans.
Bonger-Cohen was an admirer of Mary Shelley who wrote the novel “Frankenstein” based on fictional letters and articles. Similarity, Bonger-Cohen would create the Myth of Vincent van Gogh with help of friends like the Berlin art dealer and publisher Paul Cassier.
Read the chapter on “Impressionism”, page 91, in the online book “Longing, Belonging and the making of Jewish Consumer Culture” by Veronica Grodzinski for a glimpse on the 1911 Vinnen Manifesto and Theodor Alt’s reaction to French Impressionism and van Gogh. (Alt may be the same Theodor Alt referred to by Alois ‘Adi’ Hiller as his favorite teacher which would then indicate a controlled opposition.) The chapter also mentions other art dealers and collectors, Gason and Joseph, Bernheim, Isaac de Camondo (Musee d’Orsay) who influenced public perception down to the present day.
Vincent “Cent” van Gogh, one of Vincent’s uncles, was a major art dealer in the international firm Goupil & Cie with offices from Australia to New York City. The firm sold and produced lithographic art works. While I have no proof, they did have the means to make commissioned artwork from various artists. Consider the French painter Charles-Francois Daubigny who Vincent van Gogh thought was the greatest of that time. I can imagine Daubigny saying that as “Vincent”. Both used the double proportioned canvas format and had some similar brushstrokes such as flicking a spattering of paint to represent the white foam of crashing waves. While I can see Daubigny using that technique, not van Gogh as he was too stiff in his handling of the brush. Perhaps a hand writing analysis between the two and other painters would be informative. (Amusingly Daubigny looks like the actor Robert Downey Jr.)
On a side note, it is occasionally written van Gogh’s were rolled up after being recently painted which doesn’t make sense since he painted in heavy impasto layers that could take a year to paint to dry. Rolling them up would create a monoprint on the back of the canvas.
Enter the Lt. Colonel. Another uncle, Johannes “Jo” or “Jan” van Gogh, was a Dutch Vice Admiral and Officer of the Military Wilhelm Order. (For fun, Johannes facially looks more like a relative of the painter Paul Gauguin rather than Theo and Vincent who have the chicken stare of General George Cluster. Gauguin’s ancestor Aline Marie Gauguin/born Chazal Tristan resembles the French painter Edgar Degas.)
Throw in the whole van Gogh family back to Gerrit von Goch from the Kleve district of Germany. Reformed or ‘Christian’ converts? The anti-Pelagianist Johnnes von Goch is interesting as Pelagianism does not adhere to the belief in the guilt of original sin hanging around one’s neck in order to progress through life.
My hunch is that “Vincent van Gogh” was a conglomerate of various painters and painters. Created for what? Dunno. If nothing else to advertise the then new expensive tube pigments to make art suppliers wealthy using the logo “No talent, no problem”. His overall paintings within a ten-year period are too erratic for one person. One portrait painting has a disproportional face while another is well articulated in its facial planes especially around the side of the nose as if was done by an Academy trained painter. Vincent’s use of heavy contour lines to indicate volume seems like a lithographer painting. Expressionism without drawing skills is decorative vanity.
Of course, this is all opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, Miles should take a look at Van Gogh, and I say that even as a lover of his art. Tbh I prefer his “reed pen” sketches/drawings. They are beautiful, if he did indeed draw ’em. I think he was real, he talent was real and there are many authentic works. However, after his death then the fake-machinery was set in motion and many fake works were created. I said “I think”. Obviously I don’t know and expect all of his life and works to be a fabrications; but I hope not 😀
LikeLike
“his talent was real”
“to be a fabrication”
I need to double-check more often 😛
Anyway, Andre that was a great overview of the spooky Van Gogh family…
Good grief!
LikeLike
Thank you for your comment nada0101.
I guess Mathis, having seen the original van Goghs, would say his paintings have impact and therefore in that sense are real.
I question how ‘fake’ van Goghs’ there are, 80%, 90% … 99.9%? Were they shop produced, some from photographs? See his painting “Langlois Bridge with Washing Women”. The bridge in actually is not that big compared to the horse and carriage on the bridge. I like the painting but possibly it was copied from a photograph of the bridge the ‘painter’ had never seen.
To show some of the “van Gogh”s” are not without a sense of humor compare his painting “Bridge at Trinquetaille in Arles” 1888 , the version with the bridge horizontally in the background, to Edvard Munch’s “The Scream”, 1893.
And then, there’s the matter of people around the Myth. They may be a “bridge”, the art dealers and galleries, that lead back to Miles early articles that indicate galleries are only for the well connected.
LikeLike
I happen to know a lot about Van Gogh, including the above. I do think he was Jewish and that he benefitted after death from their promotion, but I don’t think he was a fake in any sense. I don’t think he was “multiple hands”. I think his journals would have been impossible for a committee to fake. They are extensive, of a piece, and ring true, unlike say the journals of Anne Frank.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for the response. Rest easy Mr Gogh, rest easy.
LikeLike
What doesn’t ring true is, that in the span of about ten years, the wide facial differences and painting style in his self portraits from his, say, not so attractive early photograph to the one that comes across as some Dureresque acetic monk … but then it’s a mute point, since being new to Josh’s site I gather I’m replying to Miles himself?
What I don’t buy as a not so full time painter, day job, I perceive is the schlockish public notion derived from the van Gogh promoted myth that one can be mad (” … too much intense sun on the Nordic brain.” as one observer said of van Gogh.) and push out masterpieces. That, and the similiar b.s., drugs can make you creative. Leave those fantasies for the well-connected kids
Thanks for the articles, appreciate the effort that I can only imagine must go into making them.
LikeLike
yeah, MathisderMaler is me, Miles Mathis. I don’t use monikers. Of course there are a number of fake VG’s, but the change in his style is easy to comprehend: he got better. He painted a lot and improved. Most people are better after ten years of practice. He didn’t have a lot of drawing talent to start with, though he had some. He was never going to be a Van Dyck or Sargent. But he did have a lot of emotion, which he eventually got into the paintings somehow. You really have to see them in person, the best ones I mean. I didn’t like VG viewing pics of his works, but when I saw them in person I shut my mouth. They are quite amazing, and there is no way they were created by studios or multiple hands. Like you, I am against drugs, but we know VG drank a lot of absinthe, which didn’t do his head any good. He also didn’t take care of himself otherwise, not eating right, etc, getting enough sleep. We may see that in the late paintings. Some of their power may come from that, or may not. He had that same boldness and rawness early on, but didn’t know how to use color. I think he could have produced the work without the absinthe, but we will never know. He was plenty strung out from sadness and loneliness, so he didn’t really need the drugs to heighten his emotions further.
LikeLike
I strongly agree that you need to see Van Gogh paintings in person, to fully get him. One time in the ’90s I was traveling in California, and the day I was leaving LA, someone suggested I see the J Paul Getty Museum, which was having its grand opening. I went, with no idea what to expect. I was wandering through some rooms full of antiquities that didn’t intrigue me, feeling bored and tired, when suddenly I was right in front of a big painting of a garden. I knew the artist right away, who could mistake it? It was Van Gogh’s Irises. Instantly I felt soothed and nourished. I stood and drank it in, and wondered how he caught the spirits of the flowers. Never saw so much life on a canvas. I started to cry, I just stood there weeping, it was great!
This is reminding me, my mother said to see the Van Gogh section at the Rijksmuseum. She said she kept getting the feeling, he HAD to paint!
Also I recommend if you’re interested and can find the time, read Vincent’s letters to his brother Theo, or read the popular bio Lust for Life, which I think is based mainly on those letters. I’m amazed how far VvG went without training, only insight, emotion, and determination.
LikeLike
I haven’t seen in any person, but viewed online, the visual style of Daubigny and Van Gogh is noticeably different. Van Gogh’s style and brushwork also seems quite consistent across his career, suggesting it wasn’t by committee. This doesn’t mean he wasn’t connected – it just means he produced his own work.
The thing about impressionism is that it was the beginning of the end. The bridge between old masterpieces and modern junk. If you paint only one layer and do so in broader brush strokes you can finish pieces much more quickly then if you paint many layers with an emphasis on fine detail. This allows you to make a greater volume of work, and presumably, though I haven’t researched the economic impact of impression, greater volume of sales. All you need then is for the critics and marketing sector to hype this as being as good (or better) than what came before so the public get on board. This doesn’t mean there weren’t any great impressionist painters. There were, and their freedom of style could certainly infuse a little more personality than what came before. At their best they run rings around modern art – but their body of work is often enormous, and of inconsistent quality (even if style is consistent). At their worst, they look a lot like modern art. In my opinion Van Gogh does have some masterpieces, but also a large number of works I wouldn’t look at twice. Perhaps he just put a little more time into the portraits with better facial proportions? I wouldn’t be surprised if there were a few “fake” Van Gogh’s out there – painted by others in his style. It would be easier to fake that than a Da Vinci or Titian. But I don’t think Daubigny was one of them.
You’ve raised some good points though. “No talent, no problem,” is a slogan for the modern world, if ever there was one. Perhaps impressionism, followed by modernism, was ushered in because they wanted to increase sales of their art supplies. The more quickly work is produced, the more paint and canvas and brushes are sold. Furthermore, if the general public feel themselves capable of matching the work in the galleries, the more likely they are to take up the hobby or profession. Not to mention, as Miles has written, that the art sales are a good way disguise transactions.
LikeLike
Yes Daubigny has a much lighter touch than VG. Neither could have painted the other’s pictures.
LikeLike
In reply to Miles and Benjamin.
Again. Miles, thanks for your replies. I put forward a rough theory at best and you replied, good enough. I respect what you have to say, both as an artist and researcher. I still abide by my view of van Gogh’s work and perhaps with some time will continue to investigate it, although Sargent and others would be more fun and useful. Using the tools, genealogy, etc., learned from your papers will help.
I grew up around the Metropolitan Museum of Art and other museums. Impressionism? Cerulean blue and puffy happy clouds. Van Gogh? Some are interesting but the majority whelter because they are fakes or whatever, are like a poke in the eye.
Was van Gogh’s work consistent? With all the fakes, I believe there is a majority of non-VG’s, it’s like trying to separate the wheat from the chaff. See Philip Scott Johnson’s You Tube video of Van Gogh’s portraits done thru morphing. The styles and brushwork are all over the map. Print out van Gogh photo as a young man and compare it to his portraits. Usually, a painter has two or three style changes throughout their career. Van Gogh Was van Gogh a shape-shifter like the video? Just kidding.
And that is one point, if his Myth is built upon these paintings and work then it’s a petty shaky foundation, but with great promotion, starting with van Gogh-Bonger-Cohen “letters”. I’m assuming she wrote the letters as an alter-ego, not a committee. Then follow the money-trails, Cassirer, dealers, galleries, International Goupil & Cie, say to the 1913 Amory Show in New York City. Study the repeal of the Tariff Laws against European Art, or just Impressionism and learn from original material why opinions were like they were.
Daubigny? Both van Gogh and Daubigny painted seascapes. Study the white crest of the wave tops on each’s paintings. Daubigny style is looser than van Gogh choppy style, yet van Gogh’s seascape painting(s) has Daubigny’s loose “lighter touch” white cap brushwork along with his choppy brush strokes. Why? Was it an emulation of someone he greatly admired? Then why only the wave crests? Then study the brushstrokes of each painter. Look at how the birds were indicated. With computer imagery you can down grade a high-resolution image to a lower resolution but not the other way around with interpolation and its resultant blurriness. Daubigny as a better trained painter could possibly imitate a ‘van Gogh’ technique fairly-well, but van Gogh as an untrained painter would have a difficult time of it. Still, a better painter will leave some of their style in the imitation.
Anyway, is Daubigny a done deal as a painter of “Van Gogh’s”. No. Definitely, not. More study is required but comparing brush stroke handling is a start. Handwriting analysis would be good. (Daubigny’s and his son’s history are interesting.)
Impressionism paintings were done in layers over a period of days to allow the paint dry somewhat and not muddle the pigments. Can one be done in a day? Yes, but more likely they were done over time. As I wrote before, I doubt van Gogh’s paintings were rolled-up after recently being painted as written in some accounts. Especially, because of the thick impasto paint layers would require up to a year or more to dry. Rolling the canvas would create a mono-print on the canvas back. It would take a lot of additive turpentine to speed up the drying. Ha, maybe there’s a new theory for his illness, the same tubes-paints that were being promoted made van Gogh ill. Anyone remember Arsenic Green in Arts & Craft wallpaper?
“Bridge between old masterpieces and modern junk”? There are long continuums between those points. A lot of hard work, cognitive effort, history, economics, etc. and talent to get from point A to point B. More like branches on a tree than points. Impressionism was a blip on the radar.
Sorry, for rambling on a post that is supposed to be lists.
And, Congratulations to Mr. Miles W. Mathis for another great year of great articles. Thank you.
Hip-hip.
LikeLike
Speaking of fuzzy logic, my quote, “… but van Gogh as an untrained painter would have a difficult time of it.” would have be better said,”… but van Gogh as an untrained painter would have a difficult time of imitating a Daubigny.”. So, what are Daubigny’s brushstrokes doing in a ‘VG’ painting?
LikeLike