Follow the money. That is the bottom-line. Everyone can say ‘blah blah blah’ but make sure you follow the money, then you’ll find the truth. Same thing goes for that situation [selling Iraqi oil during the 90’s embargo]. So the only thing Iraq and their buying partners wanted was to remain free of any accusations, because the partners who bought it were the ones placing the boycott in the first place. But they are actually all friends on the same side. Everybody thinks there are opposites like good and bad guys in the world, but on the higher levels it is just a game and they are all working together. However, they do have to stick to the rules and regulations they themselves have created to keep the rest of society suppressed and make sure that it will not be too crowded at the top.
…So the entire world as we think we know it, is just an illusion we believe in.
That is an excerpt from an interview with a Dutch guy who says he was involved in foreign exchange trading and got involved in, essentially, laundering money for TPTB. I’ve been super busy of late, too busy to post or comment here or much of anywhere. But I saw a link to this video and took the time to watch it. I think it’s worth sharing, so that’s what I’m doing.
I’m not posting it because I believe it’s the gospel truth. But I admit I find it very compelling. I don’t know whether the guy in this interview is telling the truth (as he knows it) or is just a very good actor. It touches on a lot of divisive issues regarding the TPTB, and I think many of you who will watch it take opposing views on some of those issues. But whatever your opinions, I don’t think watching this will be a waste of time. I’m not going to take a stand on any of those issues at the moment or say where I think this guy might be misdirecting; you are free to do so in comments. [Update: with the subsequent release of parts 2 and especially 3 of his interview series, it has become clear to me that this guy is a fraud. Also see the comments below.] For now I will simply pass it along without further comment:
Cutting Through the Fog 
The obvious question is why is he talking now, since he is known and easy to find. Beyond that, however, it was a moving presentation. Most of it is not surprising – I have known for some time now that there are no enemies at high levels, that Saddam Hussein and ISIS and all of that are all playing in the same league, like football teams, paid to be enemies on the field, but friends behind the scenes. I have wondered about the code of secrecy, as these people do not talk, except this guy. Zionism and the protocols … I’ve been avoiding them but they sit, twenty feet away from me here by my chair.
His talk about the Luciferian services he attended reminded me of Eyes Wide Shut.
LikeLike
There are few subjects that Ronald talks about which are not easy to rationalize. Some of them are pretty obvious – like “follow the money” or “Ruling Elite of 8000-8500 people all together”, however some are rather shocking to accept if true – Lucifer worshiping / Satanism and child sacrifice. As much as it’s worth, I have run across Satanism and sacrifice subject many times while learning and researching lately about things that I find interesting enough – and there seem to be way to many people claiming the same to be true as it is in the case of Satanism of the PTB.
I noticed he got excited while talking about receiving an offer to enter into this big financial game – his eyes were glaring with some strange lust while he was describing it, and then later in the interview, he mentioned once again how cool it would be to have entered/reached that position among 8000-8500 members of the ruling elite. With it, he clearly demonstrated what is true about us, the humans, ultimately – all weaknesses and greed, lust for power and materialism comes from within and that is where it all goes “into the darkness” of human soul. Money as the root of all Evil. If Ronald was capable of laughing about some suicide he caused with his currency manipulations, you can only imagine the magnitude of malevolent deeds done by all such financial “gurus”, that are steering this world on daily basis. They say that remorse is not to be despised, but I have to admit I will most probably never fully understand such devotion to materialism and greed as Ronald still manifests. Although seemingly shocked by the unwritten rules of Elite, he never shows / expresses remorse about all he was doing until the point he was psychologically broken and dismissed. If his “moral freezer” was still operational, we would have never seen that particular interview – as Ronald would have remained happily within that nasty financial world. Unluckily for him, his conscious mind got over his character.
Most probably, being single and with no children, Ronald was encouraged to speak out about it all as he has/had nothing left to lose. Everybody needs confession in the end, it only depends how such confession comes about.
Anyway, I only wish that children sacrifice is the only misdirection he did in that interview. That is just too outrageous to accept and/or rationalize for my worldview, I’m leaving that particular subject alone. The idea of looking into it and finding the truth is just to frightening for me, so I may be an ignorant fool about it until further notice. .
LikeLiked by 1 person
No doubt this guy raises all kinds of red flags, and there are all kinds of questions that could and should be asked about this guy — where did he come from, what has he been doing for the last 15 or so years since he was kicked out of the club, why is he speaking out now, is he misdirecting (very likely), and if so, about what?
He answers your question, Mark, by saying that as long as he doesn’t “name names” or organizations he’ll be OK. Doesn’t quite pass the smell test but isn’t obviously untrue at the same time.
I liked his description of how they use front companies and people like him to do their dirty work.
LikeLike
If I were on a jury, I’d find him to be very credible, but as you say, he might very well be pushing another agenda.
LikeLike
Listening further, I’ll say this for what it’s worth. I had 6 out of body experiences, not near death experiences. These were self induced and all happened in 2014. That doesn’t necessarily mean what he’s saying is true, I’m just chiming in. The feeling is profound and very real and I’m not selling anything, not even a video.
LikeLike
I’ve had only two myself, but both were induced by psilocybin, around twenty years ago. Incredibly real-feeling but of course it was entirely in my head.
LikeLike
We went into Denver one evening to listen to Thom Hartmann, maybe in 2009. I now suspect him to be a lifetime actor, once known as Brandon DeWilde. We walked into the room and he sat in a chair looking down at his lap, and I thought he was scowling. I imagined he held us, dumb liberals, in contempt. (Hartmann is a radio broadcaster here in the US, supposedly a liberal alternative to right wing talk radio. He also paired with a guy named LaMar Waldron to write two books claiming that the mob had killed JFK, now easily seen as misdirection.) there was nothing memorable in his talk, and the Q&A was painful, as he had no patience for the usual speech makers you encounter in that milieu, the book tour. All in all, I thought the guy was despising his work, maybe even his life.
What if, like Ronald, he has signed a lifetime contract? Could this be the famous bargain with the devil? I have wondered this about all our actors, that they are living lives of both fame and utter deceit at once … do they fall asleep at night wishing to have more chance to be regular people, and are feeling stained? BIll O’Reilly, just fired, has a legendary temper. Is that his real self wanting out?
LikeLiked by 1 person
While I couldn’t stomach watching the video, I would like to assert that all references to the occult have pretty much already been “outed”, by our pal Miles Mathis. We don’t have to take his word(s) for it, either. Neither God nor Satan has ever responded to my cries of woe, nor any other deity – nor have they for anyone else in history, it would seem. Moreover, these occult and Satanic and Luciferian references have been used time and time again by agents and intel types, going back to the Salem Witch Trials and beyond, to keep people in fear. Theosophy. Mormonism, even. Scientology. But on top of that, they mean to confuse people with religious mumbo-jumbo and demolish Christianity and the mainstream religions, chiefly to take those tithes for themselves. I have no problem with their demolition, but we don’t need lies to negate them.
I was recently watching a TV crime show about Children Who Kill (the title, I believe), and in one episode they referred to the suspect childrens’ chief influence as being the band Slayer. They said the band’s name some fifty or sixty times in a 30-minute episode, and claimed that Slayer’s songs of rape, murder, and Satanism caused these children to act out. In this particular case, the plaintiffs even SUED the band themselves, and lobbied their record company to market and censure their albums as violent, in the same way hard-R rated movies were in the 80s. The goal was to make it so you’d need to be 18 with ID to purchase a Slayer album, or something like that.
As a lifelong listener to Metal, both Death and otherwise, I found this hilarious. Slayer doesn’t advocate or celebrate any of these things. They’re MOCKING them, mocking the culture that celebrates them. They’re calling out all the fakery in the occult, in serial killers and mass murderers, in America, and in spiritual folks.
Interesting aside, In the intro to one of their songs, “Deviance”, from their 2001 album “God Hates us All”, you can hear what appears to be an airplane hijacking coming through the radio:
Why is this interesting? The album was released on 9/11. No shit. 2001.
Anyway, Slayer is one of the milder, more sensitive bands in the genre as far as I’m concerned. When the people in that TV show dropped their name over and over, so many times, with so many false claims about what their music is about or means, it just got to me. It’s more of that occult project fakery. One might even classify the band as BEING part of that project. Paid for by TPB, or something. If they weren’t so interesting and obscene I might even believe it. Controlled opposition, outright. Take angry, intelligent people and give them an outlet, so they don’t do anything but sit on the sidelines singing along.
Anything spiritual or occult should be highly suspect, not just because of physics or reality but because of the spin involved.
LikeLike
I would argue at this point about dismissing or “outing” any belief system as irrelevant just because Miles said so. Although I agree with majority of his findings and logic, the subject of domination of our reality by mostly sinister actions against humanity throughout recorded history is just to much to be overlooked and ignored. I think these “satanists” do have some shared beliefs and they do manifest them – I’m pretty sure you have noticed numerology or symbology aspect of faked/false flag events, so this is for sure a couple of such belief ponders they rely upon. Since all that PTB do is morally and ethically wrong and unacceptable, one can say without doubt, that they share a sinister aspect towards life itself. How could you otherwise explain all nasty hoaxes and pre-planned wars waged globally, crimes of ruling imperialists against humanity never punished, controlled opposition agents and traces of all other sinister-minded details of reality, that is being forced down our throats? Why should life be rigged according to anybody’s views and wishes? Why is faking of reality so omnipotent discovery if you look deeper into it? A normal person does not have such beliefs and/or behavioral characteristics that would allow such dirty deeds, so there must be something we’re missing here. In my opinion, the PTB’s psychopaths posted as executioners of their sinister plans must have been trained as such psychopaths, while those really in power stay behind hidden and usually unexposed perpetrators. And just who is in charge of such psychopaths’ trainings, where do they come from so well prepared? We may compare and name them to/after some religious leftovers such as i.e. satanists or demon-possessed personalities, or in modern etymology as psychopaths, evil people or anything by that value, where the essence is that regardless of their naming, their deeds produce horror, misery, death, destruction, etc. All of that is just not coincidental and should not be overlooked or downgraded as irrelevant fact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Vexman:
I completely agree with you there. These people definitely have some void of empathy or sympathy that you don’t see in most people, at least not most people who aren’t billionaires. It seems like in order to understand pain, strife, and turmoil, you have to go through some yourself. Most people get enough of this from regular life, be it skinning your knee riding a bicycle for the first time or be it years of financial struggle and stress. It seems like “those types” however lack this basic compassion.
I think what I was getting at is that there’s no supernatural side to the occult/Satanic topics, at least I’ve never witnessed anything supernatural and have no reason to believe in demons, possession, etc.. So when these topics are mentioned in conjunction with TPB, it comes across to me as an intel marker. I don’t believe they’re conjuring spirits or speaking with the dead.
LikeLike
Hey Jared and Vexman, interesting comments. This is definitely one of those areas where I remain somewhat agnostic. For the record, I don’t think that Satanism has anything to really do with the supernatural, but believers may think it does. Miles has argued that Satanism is just a pose or a cover. I think it might be more than that, though it doesn’t necessarily mean that the people at the very top really believe it. They may push it as a way to control the people who work for them. Or it might all just be made up. But whether they themselves are satanists or just vicious greedy psychopaths, there is no question that they have very, very dark souls.
LikeLike
I agree with the notion that there is nothing supernatural about occult nor satanic, moreover, I think naming one group and consequently misdirecting through naming this particular group of psychopaths is the goal here. Making these occult/satanic subjects widely acceptable and recognizable, i.e. by masking it as kabbalah, gnosticism, theosophy, satanism, occultism, etc, one could dismiss the essence before looking into it. I argued about it directly with Miles some time ago, but we didn’t come to an agreement (nor debate, as a matter of fact).
When I want to communicate about such group, I mostly use the word “satanic” as it is commonly recognized to describe evil doers in their essence – undeniably though, “satanic” as a word is rooted in religion as diametrically opposed to all good and positive (as well as i.e. “devil”). Even though I do realize “satanic” has religious aspect, I’ve never used it in order to connect it to “supernatural” (or any custom-ordered miracles such as conjuring spirits or talking with the dead) nor do I think supernatural exists. Speaking out of my own viewpoint, I’m not a religious guy yet when looking for a single word to describe essentially evil deeds, “satanic” is in my opinion the best choice to do so.
I’ve never thought about it as an intel marker, but I’ve realized when reading your comment that I should at least explain my choice of such word when using it. Since I’m trying to clarify or help bring to better understanding a subject of evil-doers and their motives in general, such confusion due to naming just needs to be avoided. Again, confusion with naming some particular set of beliefs / groups of people, which are obviously there, is another issue imposed on all seeking for some truth about anything.
LikeLike
The interview presented here caused some stir in the alternative movement here in the Netherlands, as some ‘non-sanctioned’ elements in this movement raised some important questions about the authenticity and motives of Ronald (and his interviewer by the way). (I refer here to http://www.martinvrijland.nl.) Ronald is heavily supported by the ´official´ alternative media, even the MSM has picked it up (major red flag!). The controversy about it being mainly that the interviews are rather a publicity ‘stunt’ of Ronald’s supposed ‘civil bank run by professionals’. Most likely Ronald is an actor (the timelines in his accounts about his past are inconsistent for example, and his age doesn’t fit his ‘unofficial’ and never published (or rather non-existent) resume) who manages to throw all the hot conspiracy topics in one pot,as to appeal to as broad an ‘awakening’ audience as possible. First to entice them to invest in his shady financial business (deblijeb.nl), and second to pull ‘truthers’ back into the matrix (as ordained by his handlers). Though Ronald might be saying a lot of truthful things here, no doubt about it – I’m not buying he’s for real. Furthermore I think it shows the cynicism of the ‘PTB’: they’re mocking us here by pulling out all the big guns (the Protocols, Satanism, child sacrifice, etc), and now they even think they have found a formula to bilk money out of the pockets of naive ‘awakened’ souls, while still keeping them caged in their matrix within their matrix within their matrix.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Simon, welcome! Thank you for taking the time to comment here and provide background on some things of which I was unaware. With the recent release of part III of his interview series, I finally made up my mind that he is acting. I suppose there is some truth sprinkled into his narrative, but no telling where it ends and the lies begin. I’m tempted to just delete this post, but I will leave it up because I think there is valuable stuff in the comments, especially from you!
LikeLike
All the comments so far have made great points and I agree with Josh there is some valuable stuff here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My opinion:
Looking at 24:00–>27:00 — if this guy is acting he is on the level of Hollywood’s very best. Meryl Streep could do no better.
I greatly respect Miles Mathis’ views but, in my opinion, this guy is telling the truth about what he saw as he saw it. I see no evidence that he is lying.
Now, it may be that the Satanism thing is only at certain levels within their “organization.” It may be that it is only used to weed out those they feel are too “weak” or those that, as he says, can’t be easily blackmailed, etc
But, I do believe that it does exist at some levels within the ranks of “the elite” or whatever you want to call them.
And, my view is not only based on that video. I worked in Hollywood for 20 years. At the lower rungs, I admit, but I still saw enough evidence to convince me that it does exist in THAT milieu. And if it exists in spook-controlled Hollywood then it likely exists further up the food chain.
LikeLike
II politely disagree. Watch his eyes during that stretch. He may not be lying about the situation outright, but it seems like he’s reiterating it in his head and knows that he’s not being entirely honest. Possibly just embellishing.
Meryl Streep maybe couldn’t do better, but Jessica Lange performs this same kind of chagrin multiple times in every season of American Horror Story she stars in. The near-tears, the slight peckishness to the eyes when she’s lying (when her character is lying). She’s a very well-practiced liar, and pulls it off very well.
This guy has some elements of those Lange looks in that three-minute stretch.
But I think another important aspect not really discussed here is that Satan isn’t real so either we have yet another absurd religion or more misdirection. I’m inclined towards the latter.
LikeLike
“He may not be lying about the situation outright, but it seems like he’s reiterating it in his head and knows that he’s not being entirely honest. Possibly just embellishing. ”
Huh? I don’t understand this. He may not be lying outright? Just embellishing? What does that mean?
And, I’m glad that Jessica Lange is such a good actor but how is that relevant? I only mentioned Streep as a metaphor for acting, not as proof of anything.
“But I think another important aspect not really discussed here is that Satan isn’t real so either we have yet another absurd religion or more misdirection. I’m inclined towards the latter.”
Again — huh?
I don’t think ‘God’ is real either so does that mean that no one believes in Him? There are no Christians? There are no Jews? There are no Muslims? What are you saying?
Of course Satanism is absurd!
LikeLike
The difference between lying outright and embellishing is that one is a complete fabrication, and the other is an exaggeration. If you like, I can link the Dictionary.com definitions of these words to help you translate them to your native language? I know, they’re rather large words but I cannot apologize for my vocabulary.
I mentioned Lange as an actress in this context because she’s an actual actress actually acting the same way this guy in our video is trying to act – and he fails, where she is successful. He is transparently acting and his tells give it away. Lange has no tells, which is why she’s such a great actress. Streep is not, and has many.
Again, huh, I don’t know what you’re asking because you’re just being contrarian for fun and for some reason you thought that would work here. Of course it matters that Satan isn’t real. If he were, it would be a completely different story. Another fake religion is irrelevant. Given the demonstrable reality of moral bankruptcy exhibited by all false relgions, fake Satanists cannot be expected to deliver anything else.
That is to say, since you’re having a rough time here, that these people being Satanic is not only false but irrelevant. The real religion, the real god, with these people is of course money.
LikeLike
Hello,
You have a lot of certainties with your assertions that are not based on any kind of tangible evidence by insisting forcefully that Satan does not exist! On what do you base yourself? To assert is not a force of immutable truth, you should know that. It does not advance the debate and the awareness. Individuals capable of the worst crimes, which often defy belief, are easily capable of carrying out human sacrifices, without the shadow of any remorse! How can they do this, you may ask? It is easy to understand that they do not have any kind of conscience or humanity in them, they are therefore and as a result, cursed, no more, no less. One should not confuse the religions that are in their respective books full of love and well being for the man with the practice that is done. These are two very distinct things and you have not grasped it, because the elite has formatted you, whether you like it or not, to see in religions the causes of all our misfortunes. Finally you say that money is the engine that governs the elite, this does not hold since they are the ones who have the money, and therefore the power to print it. It has been a long time that money has only the value of ink and paper and not of its equivalent in gold or silver. This goes even further, since they are virtual computer lines that they can manipulate as they please.As for the video, it is not certain that it tells the whole truth, but a good part of it seems highly probable. The good question that we must ask ourselves is to know what their real motivations are, because it has not escaped you that they control everything, including our lives.
So it would be legitimate to think that they are trying to defy God, even if you don’t believe it, and an alliance on their part with Satan, or the forces of evil, whatever you want to call it, is more than likely.
Sorry for my broken English.
LikeLike
Wrong.
LikeLike
I’m gonna have to go with Jared on this one, although I admit I was initially taken in by the level of acting. It’s very good and very convincing. However, his subsequent videos made me realize he’s not genuine. However, I do believe it’s entirely possible that TPTB have created a Satanic or Luciferian belief system for their henchmen to follow, even if they themselves don’t necessarily believe in it. However, I think that a lot of people who think it’s far-fetched don’t really understand what is involved in that belief system. It actually resembles the modern worldview much more than people tend to realize. I remember chatting with a guy on Reddit who said he was a former Satanist. I asked him if everyone that was involved actually believed in it. IIRC he said something like 60% believed in it, 40% didn’t. Take that for what it’s worth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I do believe it’s entirely possible that TPTB have created a Satanic or Luciferian belief system for their henchmen to follow, even if they themselves don’t necessarily believe in it. ”
Well, isn’t that exactly what I said?
You have a funny way of disagreeing (by agreeing). 🙂
LikeLike
You have a very interesting definition of “exactly”, Rolleikin, in that it’s completely incorrect. Usually people try to use the definitions of words instead of random poetic license, simply to pose insult. I suppose it’s an accuracy/precision type of thing?
LikeLike
I said:
“Now, it may be that the Satanism thing is only at certain levels within their ‘organization.’ It may be that it is only used to weed out those they feel are too weak or those that, as he says, can’t be easily blackmailed, etc
“But, I do believe that it does exist at some levels within the ranks of “the elite” or whatever you want to call them.”
And, Josh said:
“I do believe it’s entirely possible that TPTB have created a Satanic or Luciferian belief system for their henchmen to follow, even if they themselves don’t necessarily believe in it.”
Seems awfully similar to me. We are both saying Satanism may well exist at some levels within their ranks, no?
I see no reason to argue about any imagined minuscule differences between the two statements so why are you?
LikeLike
Jared said:
“The difference between lying outright and embellishing is that one is a complete fabrication, and the other is an exaggeration.”
Please, Jared, be specific about what you mean in this case. OK, you seem to feel that Ron is not lying outright but merely embellishing his tale of child sacrifice, but HOW exactly?
Do you mean they merely torture children instead of murder them? Or, what? This is why I asked you what you mean. Please be specific because to say that he is “embellishing” without giving specifics is rather vague and meaningless.
LikeLike